Seaside Developments, Inc. v. McGoldrick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Seaside Developments, Inc. v. McGoldrick

285 A.D. 1085, 140 N.Y.S.2d 5, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6736

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 25, 1955

StatusPublished

This text of 285 A.D. 1085 (Seaside Developments, Inc. v. McGoldrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Seaside Developments, Inc. v. McGoldrick, 285 A.D. 1085, 140 N.Y.S.2d 5, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6736 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the [1086]*1086Civil Practice Act to review a determination of the State Rent Administrator denying the landlord’s application for certificates of eviction, the appeals are from an order which conditionally granted such certificates. Order reversed on the law, with $20 costs and disbursements, and proceeding dismissed. In our opinion this record establishes that there was substantial evidence before the State Rent Administrator warranting his finding that the landlord had failed to show compliance with either section 54 or section 57 of the State Rent and Eviction Regulations, and that such finding is a reasonable basis for his determination. In the circumstances, the court may not substitute its judgment for that of the administrator. (Matter of Kaplan v. McGoldrick, 279 App. Div. 615.) Nolan, P. J.. Wenzel, Schmidt, Beldock and Murphy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the [1086]*1086Civil Practice Act to review a determination of the State Rent Administrator denying the landlord’s application for certificates of eviction, the appeals are from an order which conditionally granted such certificates. Order reversed on the law, with $20 costs and disbursements, and proceeding dismissed. In our opinion this record establishes that there was substantial evidence before the State Rent Administrator warranting his finding that the landlord had failed to show compliance with either section 54 or section 57 of the State Rent and Eviction Regulations, and that such finding is a reasonable basis for his determination. In the circumstances, the court may not substitute its judgment for that of the administrator. (Matter of Kaplan v. McGoldrick, 279 App. Div. 615.) Nolan, P. J.. Wenzel, Schmidt, Beldock and Murphy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

285 A.D. 1085, 140 N.Y.S.2d 5, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6736, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seaside-developments-inc-v-mcgoldrick-nyappdiv-1955.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack