Sears v. Van Dusen
25 Mich. 351, 1872 Mich. LEXIS 112
Opinion
held that there was no error in the conclusion of law found by the circuit judge. The finding of facts does not show that the defendant in error consented to be bound by the extension.
Judgment affirmed with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sears v. Van Dusen, 25 Mich. 351, 1872 Mich. LEXIS 112 (Mich. 1872).
25 Mich. 351 (Sears v. Van Dusen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Spurgeon v. Smitha
17 N.E. 105 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1888)
Tiffany v. Willis
37 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 266 (New York Supreme Court, 1883)
Mitchell v. Roberts
17 F. 776 (U.S. Circuit Court, 1883)
White's Adm'r v. Life Ass'n of America
63 Ala. 419 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1879)
Bonner v. Nelson
57 Ga. 433 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1876)
Winne v. Colorado Springs Co.
3 Colo. 155 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1876)
Clark v. . Sickler
64 N.Y. 231 (New York Court of Appeals, 1876)