Sears v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Sears v. United States

60 Cust. Ct. 1037

DecidedApril 24, 1968

DocketNo. P68/218; protests 295377-K, etc. (Philadelphia); No. P68/219; protests 297806-K, etc. (Los Angeles); No. P68/220; protests 312617-K and 58/4192 (Portland, Oreg.); No. P68/221; protests 313381-K/14937 and 313392-K/14842 (New Orleans); No. P68/222; protest 322707-K (San Francisco); No. P68/223; protests 60/13905 and 61/4990 (Seattle); No. P68/224; protests 60/30780-11549, etc. (Chicago)

StatusPublished

This text of 60 Cust. Ct. 1037 (Sears v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sears v. United States, 60 Cust. Ct. 1037 (cusc 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Beckworth, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of bicycles, with or without tires having wheels in diameter (measured to the outer circumference of the tire) over 25 inches, weighing less than 36 pounds complete without accessories, and not designed for use with tires having a cross-sectional diameter exceeding 1% inches and that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. Schmidt Pritchard & Co., Mangano Cycles Co. (47 CCPA 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beckworth, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of bicycles, with or without tires having wheels in diameter (measured to the outer circumference of the tire) over 25 inches, weighing less than 36 pounds complete without accessories, and not designed for use with tires having a cross-sectional diameter exceeding 1% inches and that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. Schmidt Pritchard & Co., Mangano Cycles Co. (47 CCPA 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 Cust. Ct. 1037, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sears-v-united-states-cusc-1968.