Sears v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Sears v. United States

56 Cust. Ct. 901, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1517

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedApril 20, 1966

DocketNo. P66/40; protest 62/9309 (Savannah)

StatusPublished

This text of 56 Cust. Ct. 901 (Sears v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sears v. United States, 56 Cust. Ct. 901, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1517 (cusc 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of galvanized wire fencing, composed of wires not over twenty one-hundredths and not under eight one-hundredths of one inch in diameter, similar in all material respects to that the subject of Amerlux Steel Products Corp. et al. v. United States (52 Cust. Ct. 83, C.D. 2441), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of galvanized wire fencing, composed of wires not over twenty one-hundredths and not under eight one-hundredths of one inch in diameter, similar in all material respects to that the subject of Amerlux Steel Products Corp. et al. v. United States (52 Cust. Ct. 83, C.D. 2441), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 Cust. Ct. 901, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1517, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sears-v-united-states-cusc-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack