Sears v. State
585 So. 2d 1020, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 8524, 1991 WL 159159
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 22, 1991·No. No. 90-2594·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
The issue on this appeal is whether incul-patory evidence inadvertently (or deliberately) dropped on the ground by the appellant after an illegal detention without a founded suspicion of criminal activity requires suppression of that evidence. We conclude that the answer is no. See Curry v. State, 570 So.2d 1071 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); State v. Oliver, 368 So.2d 1331 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. dismissed, 383 So.2d 1200 (Fla.1980). See also, California v. Hodari D., — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 1547, 113 L.Ed.2d 690 (1991).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sears v. State, 585 So. 2d 1020, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 8524, 1991 WL 159159 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).
585 So. 2d 1020 (Sears v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sesler v. State
588 So. 2d 343 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Wade v. State
589 So. 2d 322 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)