Sears v. State
65 So. 300, 10 Ala. App. 76, 1914 Ala. App. LEXIS 136
Opinions
We have carefully examined the transcript in this case, and discover no reversible error. The proceeding's shown in the record proper are regular, and the bill of exceptions contains nothing requiring or meriting discussion; and no matter has been pointed out or called to our attention by argument or brief in behalf of the appellant as constituting error. Let tl'« judgment appealed from be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sears v. State, 65 So. 300, 10 Ala. App. 76, 1914 Ala. App. LEXIS 136 (Ala. Ct. App. 1914).
65 So. 300 (Sears v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Grier v. State
589 So. 2d 792 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1991)
Norris v. State
75 So. 718 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1917)
Ex parte Sears
187 Ala. 672 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1914)