Sears v. Phelps

317 So. 2d 101
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 22, 1975·No. No. 75-458·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OWEN, Judge.

Defendant in a negligence suit appeals from an order denying its motion for leave to file a third party complaint. The order appealed is an interlocutory order, not a final judgment. Because the order is not one reviewable under Rule 4.2 F.A.R., this court lacks jurisdiction of the appeal. We decline to treat the matter as a petition for certiorari. The appeal is dismissed without prejudice.

Dismissed.

MAGER and DOWNEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sears v. Phelps, 317 So. 2d 101 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

317 So. 2d 101 (Sears v. Phelps) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sutton v. Cole
917 So. 2d 378 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)