Sears v. Ogden City

537 P.2d 1029, 1975 Utah LEXIS 725
Utah Supreme Court·Decided July 11, 1975·No. No. 13647·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinions

[1030]*1030ON REHEARING

HENRIOD, Chief Justice:

Respondents, filed a petition for rehearing- in this matter, which was granted, but our decision, 533 P.2d 118, after hearing, now is reaffirmed.

After review of all the briefs and arguments, we are of the opinion that petitioners’ brief and that of amicus curiae raise no points that were not considered on the appeal and that their understandable assertion to the effect “they feel that the issues before the Court . . . were not fully understood and resolved” is not supported by anything in their briefs or elsewhere, but simply appear to be a repetition of arguments already urged but rejected and now re-rejected by this Court.

TUCKETT and MAUGHAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sears v. Ogden City, 537 P.2d 1029, 1975 Utah LEXIS 725 (Utah 1975).

537 P.2d 1029 (Sears v. Ogden City) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Summum v. Duchesne City
482 F.3d 1251 (Tenth Circuit, 2007)
Price Development Co., LP v. Orem City
2000 UT 26 (Utah Supreme Court, 2000)
Municipal Building Authority v. Lowder
711 P.2d 273 (Utah Supreme Court, 1985)