Sears v. Inhabitants of Nahant
Opinion
Dismissed [543]*543for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) McCain v. Des Moines, 174 U. S. 168, 181; Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Ann Arbor R. R. Co., 178 U. S. 239, 243; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U. S. 144, 147. (2) Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Empire State-Idaho Mining Co. v. Hanley, 205 U. S. 225, 232; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71, 79; Brolan v. United States, 236 U. S. 216. (3) Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk &c. Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 599; Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Realty Co., 244 U. S. 300, 304; Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U. S. 255, 257.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
248 U.S. 542 (Sears v. Inhabitants of Nahant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.