Sears v. Inhabitants of Nahant
This text of 248 U.S. 542 (Sears v. Inhabitants of Nahant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed [543]*543for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) McCain v. Des Moines, 174 U. S. 168, 181; Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Ann Arbor R. R. Co., 178 U. S. 239, 243; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U. S. 144, 147. (2) Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Empire State-Idaho Mining Co. v. Hanley, 205 U. S. 225, 232; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71, 79; Brolan v. United States, 236 U. S. 216. (3) Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk &c. Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 599; Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Realty Co., 244 U. S. 300, 304; Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U. S. 255, 257.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
248 U.S. 542, 39 S. Ct. 133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sears-v-inhabitants-of-nahant-scotus-1918.