Sears v. Grover

172 A. 525, 116 N.J. Eq. 111, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 689

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 4, 1934·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered by Vice-Chancellor Fielder in the court of chancery.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Bodine, Perskie, Van Buskiek, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 8.

For reversal — Donges, J. 1.

For modification — Parker, Lloyd, Case, Heher, Kays, Heteield, JJ. 6.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered by Vice-Chancellor Fielder in the court of chancery.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Bodine, Perskie, Van Buskiek, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 8.

For reversal — Donges, J. 1.

For modification — Parker, Lloyd, Case, Heher, Kays, Heteield, JJ. 6.

Sears v. Grover, 172 A. 525, 116 N.J. Eq. 111, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 689 (N.J. 1934).

Pincite

172 A. 525 (Sears v. Grover) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.