Sears v. Boyce

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Sears v. Boyce

89 S.E.2d 147, 242 N.C. 606, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 629

DecidedSeptember 21, 1955

StatusPublished

This text of 89 S.E.2d 147 (Sears v. Boyce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sears v. Boyce, 89 S.E.2d 147, 242 N.C. 606, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 629 (N.C. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

PER Cubiam.

The defendant assigns as error the failure of the court to sustain his motion for judgment as of nonsuit, made at the close of plaintiff's evidence and renewed at the close of all the evidence. A careful examination of the evidence leads us to the conclusion that it was sufficient to require its submission to the jury. Therefore, the judgment will be upheld.

No error.

WiNBORNE and HiggiNS, JJ., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER Cubiam.

The defendant assigns as error the failure of the court to sustain his motion for judgment as of nonsuit, made at the close of plaintiff's evidence and renewed at the close of all the evidence. A careful examination of the evidence leads us to the conclusion that it was sufficient to require its submission to the jury. Therefore, the judgment will be upheld.

No error.

WiNBORNE and HiggiNS, JJ., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

89 S.E.2d 147, 242 N.C. 606, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 629, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sears-v-boyce-nc-1955.