Sears Termite & Pest Control, Inc. v. Arnold

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Sears Termite & Pest Control, Inc. v. Arnold

743 So. 2d 597, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13164, 1999 WL 790846

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 6, 1999

DocketNo. 99-1639

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 743 So. 2d 597 (Sears Termite & Pest Control, Inc. v. Arnold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sears Termite & Pest Control, Inc. v. Arnold, 743 So. 2d 597, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13164, 1999 WL 790846 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s motion for rehearing is granted and this court’s opinion of July 9, 1999, is withdrawn.

[598]*598On March 17, 1999, the trial court entered an order which dismissed the complaint of plaintiff Sears with prejudice as to defendants Arnold and Atchey, and without prejudice to plaintiffs right to amend its complaint as to defendant Diamond Pest Control. Appellant/plaintiff has appealed that order. However, previously the trial court had denied a request for temporary injunction and the plaintiff appealed that order in this court’s Case No. 98-4715. The nonfinal appeal was pending before this court at the time the order here on appeal was entered. The trial court lacked jurisdiction to enter the partial final judgment of March 17, 1999. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.110(k) and 9.130(f). The order of March 17, 1999, is hereby quashed as having been entered by the trial court in the absence of jurisdiction and as the order here on appeal therefore no longer in effect, this appeal is dismissed.

DISMISSED.

BARFIELD, C.J., KAHN and DAVIS, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s motion for rehearing is granted and this court’s opinion of July 9, 1999, is withdrawn.

[598]*598On March 17, 1999, the trial court entered an order which dismissed the complaint of plaintiff Sears with prejudice as to defendants Arnold and Atchey, and without prejudice to plaintiffs right to amend its complaint as to defendant Diamond Pest Control. Appellant/plaintiff has appealed that order. However, previously the trial court had denied a request for temporary injunction and the plaintiff appealed that order in this court’s Case No. 98-4715. The nonfinal appeal was pending before this court at the time the order here on appeal was entered. The trial court lacked jurisdiction to enter the partial final judgment of March 17, 1999. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.110(k) and 9.130(f). The order of March 17, 1999, is hereby quashed as having been entered by the trial court in the absence of jurisdiction and as the order here on appeal therefore no longer in effect, this appeal is dismissed.

DISMISSED.

BARFIELD, C.J., KAHN and DAVIS, JJ., CONCUR.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

743 So. 2d 597, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13164, 1999 WL 790846, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sears-termite-pest-control-inc-v-arnold-fladistctapp-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack