Sears, Roebuck v. 9 Ave.-31 St.

New York Court of Appeals

Sears, Roebuck v. 9 Ave.-31 St.

10 N.E.2d 589, 274 N.Y. 636, 1937 N.Y. LEXIS 1022

DecidedJune 11, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 10 N.E.2d 589 (Sears, Roebuck v. 9 Ave.-31 St.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sears, Roebuck v. 9 Ave.-31 St., 10 N.E.2d 589, 274 N.Y. 636, 1937 N.Y. LEXIS 1022 (N.Y. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and when returned it will be amended to read as follows: "Judgments modified so as to provide that the plaintiff shall have judgment against the defendant Natanson for the principal sum for which a verdict was directed in favor of the plaintiff by the Supreme *Page 637 Court of the State of New York plus interest computed to the date of the entry of judgment, and judgment against the defendant 9 Avenue-31 Street Corporation for the principal sum for which judgment was directed in favor of the plaintiff by the Supreme Court of the State of New York plus the occupational rent paid to the receiver from May 2 to December 31, 1931, less the principal amount of the counterclaim of the corporate defendant, with interest on each of said sums computed to the date of the entry of judgment, with costs in all courts to the appellant against the corporate defendant." (See 274 N.Y. 388.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and when returned it will be amended to read as follows: "Judgments modified so as to provide that the plaintiff shall have judgment against the defendant Natanson for the principal sum for which a verdict was directed in favor of the plaintiff by the Supreme *Page 637 Court of the State of New York plus interest computed to the date of the entry of judgment, and judgment against the defendant 9 Avenue-31 Street Corporation for the principal sum for which judgment was directed in favor of the plaintiff by the Supreme Court of the State of New York plus the occupational rent paid to the receiver from May 2 to December 31, 1931, less the principal amount of the counterclaim of the corporate defendant, with interest on each of said sums computed to the date of the entry of judgment, with costs in all courts to the appellant against the corporate defendant." (See 274 N.Y. 388.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 N.E.2d 589, 274 N.Y. 636, 1937 N.Y. LEXIS 1022, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sears-roebuck-v-9-ave-31-st-ny-1937.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack