Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Shambo

Supreme Court of Florida

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Shambo

182 So. 2d 243

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedJanuary 19, 1966

DocketNo. 34633

StatusPublished

This text of 182 So. 2d 243 (Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Shambo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Shambo, 182 So. 2d 243 (Fla. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date June 30, 1965.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The attorney for respondent Edward G. Shambo is awarded a fee in the amount of two hundred fifty dollars ($250.00) for services in this Court.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and DREW, O’CON-NELL, CALDWELL and HOBSON (Ret.), JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI