Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Butler

569 U.S. 1015, 186 L. Ed. 2d 215, 133 S. Ct. 2768, 81 U.S.L.W. 3668, 2013 WL 775366, 2013 U.S. LEXIS 4213
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 3, 2013·No. No. 12–1067.·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit for further consideration in light of Comcast Corp. v. Behrend , 569 U.S. ----, 133 S.Ct. 1426, 185 L.Ed.2d 515 (2013).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Butler, 569 U.S. 1015, 186 L. Ed. 2d 215, 133 S. Ct. 2768, 81 U.S.L.W. 3668, 2013 WL 775366, 2013 U.S. LEXIS 4213 (2013).

569 U.S. 1015 (Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Butler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Leonard v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
115 F. Supp. 3d 934 (N.D. Illinois, 2015)
Smith v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
301 F.R.D. 284 (N.D. Illinois, 2014)
Larry Butler v. Sears, Roebuck & Company
727 F.3d 796 (Seventh Circuit, 2013)
Gina Glazer v. Whirlpool Corporation
722 F.3d 838 (Sixth Circuit, 2013)