Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. Moises R. Hernandez

Court of Appeals of Texas

Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. Moises R. Hernandez

DecidedJanuary 10, 2008

Docket13-07-00728-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. Moises R. Hernandez (Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. Moises R. Hernandez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. Moises R. Hernandez, (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

NUMBER 13-07-728-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

________________________________________________________

SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO., Appellant,

v.

MOISES R. HERNANDEZ, Appellee.

On appeal from the 197th District Court of Cameron County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Sears, Roebuck and Co., perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 197th District Court of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 2004-04-2318-C-B. Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that the parties have reached an agreement to settle and compromise their differences. Appellant requests that this Court dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a). Appellant's motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. In accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the party incurring same. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this the 10th day of January, 2008.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NUMBER 13-07-728-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

________________________________________________________

SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO., Appellant,

v.

MOISES R. HERNANDEZ, Appellee.

On appeal from the 197th District Court of Cameron County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Sears, Roebuck and Co., perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 197th District Court of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 2004-04-2318-C-B. Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that the parties have reached an agreement to settle and compromise their differences. Appellant requests that this Court dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a). Appellant's motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. In accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the party incurring same. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this the 10th day of January, 2008.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. Moises R. Hernandez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sears-roebuck-and-co-v-moises-r-hernandez-texapp-2008.