Searles v. Searles

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Searles v. Searles

36 So. 3d 256, 2010 La. LEXIS 1321, 2010 WL 2542267

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided May 28, 2010·No. No. 2010-OC-0709·Published

Opinion

In re Searles, Amy Cashio;—Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, Baton Rouge City Court, No. 09-05033; 19th Judicial District Court Div. I, No. C584009.

Granted for the sole purpose of transferring the application to the court of appeal for its consideration pursuant to La. Const. [257]*257art. V, Section 10(A). See La.Sup.Ct. Rule X, Section 5(b)(b); see also Bradley v. Hostead, 03-1256 (La.9/5/03), 852 So.2d 1038.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Searles, Amy Cashio;—Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, Baton Rouge City Court, No. 09-05033; 19th Judicial District Court Div. I, No. C584009.

Granted for the sole purpose of transferring the application to the court of appeal for its consideration pursuant to La. Const. [257]*257art. V, Section 10(A). See La.Sup.Ct. Rule X, Section 5(b)(b); see also Bradley v. Hostead, 03-1256 (La.9/5/03), 852 So.2d 1038.

Searles v. Searles, 36 So. 3d 256, 2010 La. LEXIS 1321, 2010 WL 2542267 (La. 2010).

Pincite

36 So. 3d 256 (Searles v. Searles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related