Searles v. Metropolitan Correctional Center

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedJune 28, 2021
Docket1:21-cv-05395
StatusUnknown

This text of Searles v. Metropolitan Correctional Center (Searles v. Metropolitan Correctional Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Searles v. Metropolitan Correctional Center, (S.D.N.Y. 2021).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #: DATE FILED: 6/28/20 21 ------------------------------------------------------------ X JARED SEARLES, : : Plaintiff, : : 21-CV-5395 (VEC) -against- : : ORDER METROPOLITAN CORRECTIONAL CENTER : AND FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, : : Defendants. : ------------------------------------------------------------ X VALERIE CAPRONI, United States District Judge: WHEREAS on June 18, 2021, Plaintiff filed a complaint asserting claims for (1) state law assault and battery, (2) negligence and negligent hiring/training/retention/entrustment, and (3) intentional infliction of emotional distress against Defendants Metropolitan Correctional Center and Federal Bureau of Prisons, see Dkt. 1; WHEREAS Plaintiffs asserts his claims pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b), 2671 et seq., see Dkt. 1; Dkt. 1-1; and WHEREAS “[u]nder the FTCA, sovereign immunity is only waived where the United States is named as a party,” Saar v. U.S. Dep’t of Just., 705 F. Supp. 999, 1003–04 (S.D.N.Y. 1989) (citing Myers & Myers Inc. v. U.S. Postal Serv., 527 F.2d 1252, 1256 (2d Cir. 1975)); IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, to the extent Plaintiff seeks to advance claims pursuant to the FTCA for alleged torts committed by employees of the Metropolitan Correctional Center and Federal Bureau of Prisons for acts committed in their official capacity as employees of the U.S. government, not later than July 6, 2021, Plaintiff must amend his complaint to substitute the United States of America as the Defendant in this action. SO ORDERED. < ~ Neosho Ley Date: June 28, 2021 VALERIE CAPRONI New York, NY United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Myers & Myers, Inc. v. United States Postal Service
527 F.2d 1252 (Second Circuit, 1975)
Saar v. United States Department of Justice
705 F. Supp. 999 (S.D. New York, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Searles v. Metropolitan Correctional Center, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/searles-v-metropolitan-correctional-center-nysd-2021.