Searles v. Auld
111 S.E. 785, 118 S.C. 430, 1922 S.C. LEXIS 37
This text of 111 S.E. 785 (Searles v. Auld) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Searles v. Auld, 111 S.E. 785, 118 S.C. 430, 1922 S.C. LEXIS 37 (S.C. 1922).
Opinions
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
*433 For the reasons assigned by his Honor County ■ Court Judge Whaley, it is the judgment of this Court that the judgment of the County Court should be affirmed, but, however, it be remanded to the County Court in order that the appellant be allowed to ask for an order allowing him to amend his complaint if he be so advised.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Evatt v. Campbell
106 S.E.2d 447 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1959)
Webb v. Consolidated Oil Co.
100 F.2d 865 (Fifth Circuit, 1939)
Mebane v. Taylor
162 S.E. 65 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1932)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
111 S.E. 785, 118 S.C. 430, 1922 S.C. LEXIS 37, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/searles-v-auld-sc-1922.