Searle v. Mann

Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas

Searle v. Mann

1 Miles 321

CourtPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

DecidedSeptember 10, 1836

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Miles 321 (Searle v. Mann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Searle v. Mann, 1 Miles 321 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1836).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The affidavit as to the non residence of the plaintiff, is defective in not stating that the plaintiff was not a resident of the state at the time of the institution of the suit. The rule of court was not intended to designate any cause for an order for security for costs arising after suit brought, except that specially provided for, that is, “ where the plaintiff has taken the benefit of the insolvent laws.”

Motion refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The affidavit as to the non residence of the plaintiff, is defective in not stating that the plaintiff was not a resident of the state at the time of the institution of the suit. The rule of court was not intended to designate any cause for an order for security for costs arising after suit brought, except that specially provided for, that is, “ where the plaintiff has taken the benefit of the insolvent laws.”

Motion refused.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Miles 321, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/searle-v-mann-pactcomplphilad-1836.