Searle v. Gardner
13 A. 835, 10 Sadler 163, 22 Week. No. 73, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 1065
Opinion
The learned judge of the court below has so fully and satisfactorily disposed of this case, in his opinion setting forth his reasons for entering judgment for the defendant non obstante veredicto, that nothing is left for us to do> but to concur, not only in the judgment, but also in the opinion.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Searle v. Gardner, 13 A. 835, 10 Sadler 163, 22 Week. No. 73, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 1065 (Pa. 1888).
13 A. 835 (Searle v. Gardner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Valentino v. . Schantz
109 N.E. 866 (New York Court of Appeals, 1915)
Gehlen Bros. v. Knorr
36 L.R.A. 697 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1897)