Searle v. City of Lead

South Dakota Supreme Court

Searle v. City of Lead

73 N.W. 913, 10 S.D. 405, 1898 S.D. LEXIS 9

CourtSouth Dakota Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 11, 1898

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 73 N.W. 913 (Searle v. City of Lead) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Searle v. City of Lead, 73 N.W. 913, 10 S.D. 405, 1898 S.D. LEXIS 9 (S.D. 1898).

Pincite

Opinion

Haney, J.

The judgment of the circuit court in this action having been affirmed (10 S. D. 312, 73 N. W, 101), defendant and appellant now appeals from the clerk’s taxation of costs. The plaintiff and respondent made no argument, either oral or printed. She should have been allowed five' dollars “before argument,” but nothing “for argument.” Comp. Laws, § 5187. The clerk is directed to deduct the sum allowed for argument, and, as thus modified, the taxation is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Haney, J.

The judgment of the circuit court in this action having been affirmed (10 S. D. 312, 73 N. W, 101), defendant and appellant now appeals from the clerk’s taxation of costs. The plaintiff and respondent made no argument, either oral or printed. She should have been allowed five' dollars “before argument,” but nothing “for argument.” Comp. Laws, § 5187. The clerk is directed to deduct the sum allowed for argument, and, as thus modified, the taxation is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

73 N.W. 913, 10 S.D. 405, 1898 S.D. LEXIS 9, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/searle-v-city-of-lead-sd-1898.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack