Searl v. Smith
15 Ind. 23, 1860 Ind. LEXIS 273
Opinion
In this case, the hill of exceptions says that certain evidence was all the evidence; hut it shows on its face that it doesAot contain it all. Items of evidence given are not copied into the bill.
"A pleading stricken out on motion is not in the record, unless put in by bill of exceptions. Saunders v. Heaton et al., 12 Ind. 20.
The judgment is affirmed, with 5 iier cen^‘ damages and costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Searl v. Smith, 15 Ind. 23, 1860 Ind. LEXIS 273 (Ind. 1860).
15 Ind. 23 (Searl v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sherman v. Nixon
37 Ind. 153 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1871)