Searl v. Smith

15 Ind. 23, 1860 Ind. LEXIS 273
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided November 26, 1860·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this case, the hill of exceptions says that certain evidence was all the evidence; hut it shows on its face that it doesAot contain it all. Items of evidence given are not copied into the bill.

"A pleading stricken out on motion is not in the record, unless put in by bill of exceptions. Saunders v. Heaton et al., 12 Ind. 20.

The judgment is affirmed, with 5 iier cen^‘ damages and costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Searl v. Smith, 15 Ind. 23, 1860 Ind. LEXIS 273 (Ind. 1860).

15 Ind. 23 (Searl v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sherman v. Nixon
37 Ind. 153 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1871)