Searing v. Village of Saratoga Springs
This text of 46 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 307 (Searing v. Village of Saratoga Springs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff claims to recover damages sustained by her from sewage which enters upon her lot from the old sewer in Walworth street, through a sewer or pipe built on her own land by defendant, with her knowledge and assent, if not at her request. The plaintiff claims the sewage comes on her land through a defect in the pipe laid cn it by defendant, and she says that even without the sewer thus laid, the sewage from the old Walworth street sewer would run on her land and damage her. But her cause of complaint now is that sewage coming down the Walworth street sewer is dumped upon her land by reason of the pipe made on it by defendant. As this was done with her assent, if not at her suggestion, the principle comes within the cases decided by this court in McCaffrey v. City of Albany (11 Hun, 613), and' by the Court of Appeals in Matter of Rhinelander (68 N. Y., 105). If the plaintiff do not like the sewer as it remains on her land, she can take it up, and thereafter, if any sewage be illegally or improperly thrown [308]*308upon her land by the agents of defendant, she can then probably recover the damages which she may sustain.
The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
46 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/searing-v-village-of-saratoga-springs-nysupct-1886.