Searing v. Lum
5 N.J.L. 683
This text of 5 N.J.L. 683 (Searing v. Lum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Searing v. Lum, 5 N.J.L. 683 (N.J. 1819).
Opinion
The justice has acted very incorrectly in altering his record after it was made up, and a copy given to the party. Such conduct deserves reprehension and punishment. He also erred in his exposition of the law, and his judgment must, therefore, be reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
5 N.J.L. 683, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/searing-v-lum-nj-1819.