Searing v. Lum
5 N.J.L. 683
Opinion
The justice has acted very incorrectly in altering his record after it was made up, and a copy given to the party. Such conduct deserves reprehension and punishment. He also erred in his exposition of the law, and his judgment must, therefore, be reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Searing v. Lum, 5 N.J.L. 683 (N.J. 1819).
5 N.J.L. 683 (Searing v. Lum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.