Searight v. State

795 So. 2d 988, 2001 WL 804110
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 18, 2001
Docket2D01-1687
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 795 So. 2d 988 (Searight v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Searight v. State, 795 So. 2d 988, 2001 WL 804110 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

795 So.2d 988 (2001)

Robert Junior SEARIGHT, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2D01-1687.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 18, 2001.

SALCINES, Judge.

Robert Junior Searight filed a motion to correct illegal sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). In his motion Searight argued that he was entitled to additional jail credit. We affirm the trial court's order without prejudice to any right Searight might have to file either a motion for postconviction relief pursuant to rule 3.850 or a facially sufficient motion to correct illegal sentence alleging that any error in the jail credit is reviewable from the face of the record. See State v. Mancino, 714 So.2d 429 (Fla. 1998).

Affirmed.

ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and WHATLEY, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Garnett v. State
841 So. 2d 584 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Joeb v. State
822 So. 2d 554 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Whitt v. State
807 So. 2d 788 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
795 So. 2d 988, 2001 WL 804110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/searight-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.