Searcy v. Vilsack

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided April 14, 2026·No. Civil Action No. 2025-1012·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

HENRY SEARCY, JR.,

Plaintiff, Case No. 25-cv-1012 (JMC)

v.

BROOKE ROLLINS, Secretary of Agriculture, et al.,

Defendants.

ORDER

For the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED

that Defendants’ motion to dismiss, ECF 5, is GRANTED, and this case is DISMISSED. It is

further ORDERED that the dismissal of Searcy’s Title VII and breach of contract claims is WITH

PREJUDICE.

The Clerk of Court shall terminate this case.

This is a final appealable Order.

SO ORDERED.

__________________________ JIA M. COBB United States District Judge

Date: April 14, 2026

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Searcy v. Vilsack, (D.D.C. 2026).

Searcy v. Vilsack (Searcy v. Vilsack) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.