Searcy v. State
244 S.W.2d 517, 1951 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2255
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided December 12, 1951·No. No. 25568·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Appellants Joe J. Danna and Max Rud-berg are the sureties of Tennison Searcy on a bond required by a magistrate for his appearance to answer a burglary charge.
Following his indictment, Tennison Sear-cy failed to appear.
A judgment nisi was entered and following service, was made final.
No brief has been filed by appellants following their notice of appeal, and the state’s motion to dismiss the appeal must be granted. See Bell v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 244 S.W.2d 210.
The appeal is dismissed.
Opinion approved by the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Searcy v. State, 244 S.W.2d 517, 1951 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2255 (Tex. 1951).
244 S.W.2d 517 (Searcy v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Adams v. State
168 Tex. Crim. 238 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1959)