Searcy v. State

135 S.W.2d 997, 1940 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 781
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 24, 1940
DocketNo. 20780
StatusPublished

This text of 135 S.W.2d 997 (Searcy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Searcy v. State, 135 S.W.2d 997, 1940 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 781 (Tex. 1940).

Opinion

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is theft; the punishment, confinement in jail for ten days.

The record is before us without a state-' ment of facts or bills of exception. No question is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
135 S.W.2d 997, 1940 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 781, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/searcy-v-state-texcrimapp-1940.