Searcy v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Searcy v. State

148 S.E. 301, 39 Ga. App. 676, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 506

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMay 14, 1929

Docket19648

StatusPublished

This text of 148 S.E. 301 (Searcy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Searcy v. State, 148 S.E. 301, 39 Ga. App. 676, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 506 (Ga. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

Upon conflicting evidence the jury, as they had the right to be, were convinced that the defendant was guilty. The trial judge, in the exercise of his discretion, has given his approval of the conviction by overruling the motion for a new trial; and the motion being based only on the usual general grounds, this court can not interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J. eonewr.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

Upon conflicting evidence the jury, as they had the right to be, were convinced that the defendant was guilty. The trial judge, in the exercise of his discretion, has given his approval of the conviction by overruling the motion for a new trial; and the motion being based only on the usual general grounds, this court can not interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J. eonewr.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

148 S.E. 301, 39 Ga. App. 676, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 506, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/searcy-v-state-gactapp-1929.