Searcy v. State

510 So. 2d 1160, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1953, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9843
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 11, 1987
DocketNo. 86-1977
StatusPublished

This text of 510 So. 2d 1160 (Searcy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Searcy v. State, 510 So. 2d 1160, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1953, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9843 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

■Upon motion to withdraw filed by counsel pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), the court permitted defendant Sear-cy to submit a statement with grounds in support of his appeal. This court has considered the defendant’s subsequently filed statement containing his challenges to the sufficiency of the identification and to the sufficiency of the evidence pertaining to the sexual battery charge and finds no merit in the appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the adjudication and sentence.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
510 So. 2d 1160, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1953, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9843, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/searcy-v-state-fladistctapp-1987.