Searcy v. Stansberry

332 F. App'x 837

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: October 5, 2009
• Docket: 09-6396
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6396

EDGAR SEARCY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

PATRICIA STANSBERRY, Warden, F.C.C. Petersburg, Virginia,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:08-cv-00050-REP)

Submitted: September 29, 2009 Decided: October 5, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edgar Searcy, Appellant Pro Se. Robert P. McIntosh, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Edgar Searcy, a federal prisoner, appeals the district

court’s order denying relief without prejudice on his 28 U.S.C.

§ 2241 (2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Searcy v. Stansberry, No. 3:08-cv-00050-

REP (E.D. Va. Feb. 19, 2009). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED