Searcy v. Skidmore

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Searcy v. Skidmore

577 So. 2d 967, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2191, 1991 WL 33011

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 14, 1991

DocketNo. 91-82

StatusPublished

This text of 577 So. 2d 967 (Searcy v. Skidmore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Searcy v. Skidmore, 577 So. 2d 967, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2191, 1991 WL 33011 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this Petition for Writ of Mandamus, the petitioner would have us order the trial judge to act on a motion under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540 which, petitioner alleges, he has filed in the trial court. A copy of the docket sheet in this case certified by the clerk of the trial court reveals no motion under Rule 1.540. Accordingly, we deny the Petition for Writ of Mandamus without prejudice to the petitioner filing, if he otherwise can, a timely and authorized motion under Rule 1.540.

PETITION DENIED without prejudice.

COWART, HARRIS and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this Petition for Writ of Mandamus, the petitioner would have us order the trial judge to act on a motion under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540 which, petitioner alleges, he has filed in the trial court. A copy of the docket sheet in this case certified by the clerk of the trial court reveals no motion under Rule 1.540. Accordingly, we deny the Petition for Writ of Mandamus without prejudice to the petitioner filing, if he otherwise can, a timely and authorized motion under Rule 1.540.

PETITION DENIED without prejudice.

COWART, HARRIS and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

577 So. 2d 967, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2191, 1991 WL 33011, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/searcy-v-skidmore-fladistctapp-1991.