Searcy v. Justice
204 S.E.2d 25, 285 N.C. 235
This text of 204 S.E.2d 25 (Searcy v. Justice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Searcy v. Justice, 204 S.E.2d 25, 285 N.C. 235 (N.C. 1974).
Opinion
George Giffen SEARCY, by his Guardian Ad Litem, George W. Schiro
v.
George Giffen JUSTICE.
Annette Search LEVI
v.
George Giffen JUSTICE.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Randolph & Randolph, for plaintiffs.
Francis M. Coiner, Arthur J. Redden, for defendant.
Petition for writ of certiorari by Plaintiffs to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, 20 N.C.App. 559, 202 S.E.2d 314. Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Searcy Ex Rel. Schiro v. Justice
202 S.E.2d 314 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1974)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
204 S.E.2d 25, 285 N.C. 235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/searcy-v-justice-nc-1974.