Searcy M. Ferguson, Jr. v. XTO Energy, Inc.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 02-09-00408-CV
|
Searcy M. Ferguson, Jr. |
APPELLANT |
|
|
V. |
||
|
XTO Energy, Inc. |
APPELLEE |
|
------------
FROM THE 48th District Court OF Tarrant COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT
We have considered the parties’ “Joint Motion To Dismiss Appeal.” It is the court=s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).
Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.
PER CURIAM
PANEL: MEIER, DAUPHINOT, and WALKER, JJ.
DELIVERED: December 23, 2010
[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Searcy M. Ferguson, Jr. v. XTO Energy, Inc. (Searcy M. Ferguson, Jr. v. XTO Energy, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.