Searchlight CST, L.P. v. MediaMath Holdings, Inc.
Opinion
COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE SAM GLASSCOCK III STATE OF DELAWARE COURT OF CHANCERY COURTHOUSE VICE CHANCELLOR 34 THE CIRCLE GEORGETOWN, DELAWARE 19947
August 24, 2020
Eric D. Schwartz, Esq. Richard I.G. Jones, Jr., Esq. Thomas W. Briggs, Jr., Esq. Michael W. McDermott, Esq. Thomas P. Will, Esq. David B. Anthony, Esq. MORRIS NICHOLS ARSHT & TUNNEL Peter C. McGivney, Esq. LLP BERGER HARRIS LLP 1201 North Market Street 1105 North Market Street Wilmington, Delaware 19801 Wilmington, Delaware 19801
RE: Searchlight CST, L.P. v. MediaMath Holdings, Inc., C.A. No. 2020-0652-SG
Dear Counsel:
I have the Defendant’s “Motion for an Order Sealing TRO Hearing.” The
Motion seeks to place the entire hearing, scheduled for August 26, 2020, under seal.
This Court does not conduct public hearings under seal. The concept is oxymoronic.
To the extent that information necessarily disclosed in the TRO hearing scheduled
for August 26, 2020 is subject to confidential treatment under Chancery Court Rule
5.1 (or otherwise) the parties may so indicate and the public (if any) may be briefly
excused from the hearing. The public transcript may be treated likewise. Otherwise,
the Motion is denied.
To the extent the foregoing requires an Order to take effect, IT IS SO
ORDERED. Sincerely,
/s/ Sam Glasscock III
Sam Glasscock III
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Searchlight CST, L.P. v. MediaMath Holdings, Inc. (Searchlight CST, L.P. v. MediaMath Holdings, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.