Sean Rodriguez Osborn v. State
This text of Sean Rodriguez Osborn v. State (Sean Rodriguez Osborn v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-20-00190-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
SEAN RODRIGUEZ OSBORN, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.
On appeal from the 216th District Court of Kerr County, Texas.
ORDER Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa, and Silva Order Per Curiam
Before the Court is appellant's motion for pro se access to the appellate record.
Appellant's counsel filed an Anders brief, and appellant has been unable to examine the
record in order to file a pro se brief.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED the trial court ensure that appellant has the
opportunity to fully examine the appellate record on or before fifteen (15) days from the date this order issues, and it is FURTHER ORDERED that the trial court notify this Court
as to the date upon which the appellate record was made available to appellant. See Kelly
v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014).
Furthermore, appellant shall have thirty (30) days from the date the appellate
record is first made available to him to file his pro se brief with this Court. The State shall
have twenty days thereafter to file its response, if any.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed on the 14th day of April, 2021.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Sean Rodriguez Osborn v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sean-rodriguez-osborn-v-state-texapp-2021.