Sean McNerthney v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 26, 2009
Docket13-09-00044-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Sean McNerthney v. State (Sean McNerthney v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sean McNerthney v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-09-00044-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

SEAN MCNERTHNEY, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On Appeal from the 214th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Vela Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Sean Mcnerthney, attempts to appeal his conviction for evading arrest.

The trial court has certified that this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO

right of appeal.” See TEX . R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). Appellant filed a request for permission

to appeal with the trial court which was denied. See id. On February 3, 2009, this Court notified appellant’s counsel of the trial court’s

certification and ordered counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether appellant

has a right to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel’s findings as to

whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the

existence of any amended certification.

On March 6, 2009, counsel filed a letter brief with this Court. Counsel’s response

does not establish that the certification currently on file with this Court is incorrect or that

appellant otherwise has a right to appeal.

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed

if the trial court’s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal.

TEX . R. APP. P. 25.2(d); see TEX . R. APP. P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, this appeal is

DISMISSED. Any pending motions are denied as moot.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See TEX . R. APP. P. 47.2(b). Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this the 26th day of March, 2009.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Sean McNerthney v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sean-mcnerthney-v-state-texapp-2009.