Sean L. Casey II v. Jeff Lynch, et al.

E.D. California

Sean L. Casey II v. Jeff Lynch, et al.

DecidedSeptember 10, 2025

Docket2:24-cv-01316

StatusUnknown

This text of Sean L. Casey II v. Jeff Lynch, et al. (Sean L. Casey II v. Jeff Lynch, et al.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sean L. Casey II v. Jeff Lynch, et al., (E.D. Cal. 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SEAN L. CASEY II, No. 2:24-cv-1316-TLN-EFB 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 JEFF LYNCH, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Sean L. Casey II (“Plaintiff”) proceeds without counsel in this civil rights action 18 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 19 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On July 17, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 21 were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and 22 recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 11.) Plaintiff did not file 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 25 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 26 Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007). Having carefully reviewed the entire 27 file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by 28 proper analysis. 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed July 17, 2025 (ECF No. 11) are ADOPTED 3 in full; 4 2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice; and 5 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. 6 Date: September 9, 2025 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SEAN L. CASEY II, No. 2:24-cv-1316-TLN-EFB 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 JEFF LYNCH, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Sean L. Casey II (“Plaintiff”) proceeds without counsel in this civil rights action 18 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 19 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On July 17, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 21 were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and 22 recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 11.) Plaintiff did not file 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 25 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 26 Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007). Having carefully reviewed the entire 27 file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by 28 proper analysis. 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed July 17, 2025 (ECF No. 11) are ADOPTED 3 in full; 4 2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice; and 5 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. 6 Date: September 9, 2025 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Sean L. Casey II v. Jeff Lynch, et al., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sean-l-casey-ii-v-jeff-lynch-et-al-caed-2025.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack