Sean Allen Harrison v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 16, 2009
Docket03-07-00472-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Sean Allen Harrison v. State (Sean Allen Harrison v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sean Allen Harrison v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN




NO. 03-07-00472-CR

Sean Allen Harrison, Appellant



v.



The State of Texas, Appellee



FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 299TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-DC-06-300938, HONORABLE CHARLES F. BAIRD, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

PER CURIAM

Appellant's notice of appeal was filed with this Court on August 17, 2007. The reporter's record was filed on April 29, 2008, making appellant's brief due May 29, 2008. In July, after we sent notice that the brief was overdue, appellant's attorney requested and received a sixty-day extension of time, making the brief due July 28, 2008. A supplemental reporter's record was filed on July 15, and a supplemental clerk's record was filed on August 8. On July 28, appellant's new appellate counsel requested an extension of time, explaining that he was recently appointed to this cause. We granted that motion, cautioning that no further extensions would be granted and giving counsel until September 26 to file the brief. On September 29, counsel filed another motion for extension of time. On October 7, we granted that motion, ordering counsel to file the brief no later than October 27. To date, appellant's brief has not been filed.

We therefore abate the cause and remand it to the trial court to hold a hearing in accordance with rule 38.8 of the rules of appellate procedure. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2), (3). The trial court shall hold a hearing immediately to determine whether appellant still wishes to prosecute his appeal, whether appellant is indigent, and whether counsel has abandoned the appeal. See id. If appellant desires to appeal and is indigent, the trial court should make appropriate orders to ensure that appellant is adequately represented on appeal. See id. Following the hearing, the trial court should order the appropriate supplementary clerk's and reporter's records to be prepared and forwarded to this Court. See id.



Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Puryear and Henson

Abated

Filed: January 16, 2009

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Sean Allen Harrison v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sean-allen-harrison-v-state-texapp-2009.