Seamon v. Seamon
This text of 625 So. 2d 808 (Seamon v. Seamon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The trial court’s judgment was reversed by this court after we found “that the trial court erred in not granting alimony to the wife.” Seamon v. Seamon, 581 So.2d 333, 335 (Ala. Civ.App.1991).
On remand, the trial court ultimately awarded the wife three hundred dollars per month for a period of thirty-six months and specifically reserved “the issue of permanent alimony for future consideration.”
This case is now affirmed on the authority of Euler v. Euler, 515 So.2d 710 (Ala.Civ. App.1987); and Brannon v. Brannon, 477 So.2d 445 (Ala.Civ.App.1985).
The wife’s request for attorney’s fees on appeal is denied.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
625 So. 2d 808, 1993 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 194, 1993 WL 124736, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seamon-v-seamon-alacivapp-1993.