Seaman v. Zank

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Seaman v. Zank

385 So. 2d 1, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16209

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 21, 1980

DocketNo. 78-425

StatusPublished

This text of 385 So. 2d 1 (Seaman v. Zank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Seaman v. Zank, 385 So. 2d 1, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16209 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

MOORE, Judge.

This cause is affirmed. See Baptist Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Bell, 384 So.2d 145 (Fla.1980); Weems v. Dawson, 352 So.2d 1196 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977), cert. denied, 359 So.2d 1221 (Fla.1978). Although we would prefer a more definitive rule, we cannot say that reasonable men would not differ as to the action taken by the trial judge in granting a motion for new trial. Therefore, the appellant has failed to demonstrate an abuse of discretion.

AFFIRMED.

LETTS, C. J., and SPENCER C. CROSS, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MOORE, Judge.

This cause is affirmed. See Baptist Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Bell, 384 So.2d 145 (Fla.1980); Weems v. Dawson, 352 So.2d 1196 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977), cert. denied, 359 So.2d 1221 (Fla.1978). Although we would prefer a more definitive rule, we cannot say that reasonable men would not differ as to the action taken by the trial judge in granting a motion for new trial. Therefore, the appellant has failed to demonstrate an abuse of discretion.

AFFIRMED.

LETTS, C. J., and SPENCER C. CROSS, Associate Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

385 So. 2d 1, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seaman-v-zank-fladistctapp-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack