Seaman v. State

1 Ohio Law. Abs. 71
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 26, 1922·No. No. 17416·Published

Opinion

CLARK, J.:

When a person convicted under Section 13008, General Code, appears for sentence and the court thereupon, under the authority of Section 13010, General Code, proceeds to make an order covering support and bond and appoints a trustee, and the convicted person forthwith complies with such order and executes and delivers bond, conditioned as provided by Section 13010, General Code, such procedure effects a suspension of the sentence provided for in Section 13008, and the same stands suspended, conditioned upon the continued compliance by the convicted person with such order or any modification thereof made under the authority of Section 13015, General Code.

Judgment reversed.

Marshall, C. J., Hough, Wanamaker, Robinson, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Seaman v. State, 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 71 (Ohio 1922).

1 Ohio Law. Abs. 71 (Seaman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.