Seaman v. De Noyelle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Seaman v. De Noyelle

269 A.D. 945, 58 N.Y.S.2d 327, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4684

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 8, 1945·Published

Opinion

— Action for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property. Defendants appeal from an order denying their motion to dismiss the complaint, based on the ground that the contract on which the action is founded is unenforeible under the provisions of the Statute of Frauds "(Rules Civ. Prac., rule 107, subd. 8). Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements, with leave to defendants to answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. (Tobias v. Lynch. 233 N. Y. 515; N. E. D. Holding Co. v. McKinley, 246 N. Y. 40; Restatement, Contracts, § 207, clause (c), illustration 12.) Close, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Lewis and Aldrich, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Action for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property. Defendants appeal from an order denying their motion to dismiss the complaint, based on the ground that the contract on which the action is founded is unenforeible under the provisions of the Statute of Frauds "(Rules Civ. Prac., rule 107, subd. 8). Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements, with leave to defendants to answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. (Tobias v. Lynch. 233 N. Y. 515; N. E. D. Holding Co. v. McKinley, 246 N. Y. 40; Restatement, Contracts, § 207, clause (c), illustration 12.) Close, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Lewis and Aldrich, JJ., concur.

Seaman v. De Noyelle, 269 A.D. 945, 58 N.Y.S.2d 327, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4684 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1945).

Pincite

269 A.D. 945 (Seaman v. De Noyelle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related