Sealy v. Shattuck
2 Johns. Cas. 69
This text of 2 Johns. Cas. 69 (Sealy v. Shattuck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Sealy v. Shattuck, 2 Johns. Cas. 69 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1800).
Opinion
The plaintiff ought to have applied for the effect of his rule, at the next term, after notice of it was proved. Having slept so long, he must be presumed to have waived it. The motion must be denied.
Motion denied.(
(a) See n. b. to Sheldon v. McEvers, sup. vol. 1, p. 69. Oppie v. Colgrove, 19 Johns. R. 124. Burr v. Waterman, 18 id. 508. 2 Grah. Prac. 2d ed. 955.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 Johns. Cas. 69, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sealy-v-shattuck-nysupct-1800.