Sealy v. Kuttner

Supreme Court of Georgia

Sealy v. Kuttner

41 Ga. 594

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided January 15, 1871·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

WARNER, J.

The Court below erred not in charging the jury as requested by plaintiff’s counsel, but in charging to the contrary thereof, as set forth in the record. When the relation of landlord' and tenant exists between the parties, the tenant has only a usufruct in the land, which he cannot convey, except by the landlord’s consent: Code, section 2253.

Eet the judgment of the Court below be reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WARNER, J.

The Court below erred not in charging the jury as requested by plaintiff’s counsel, but in charging to the contrary thereof, as set forth in the record. When the relation of landlord' and tenant exists between the parties, the tenant has only a usufruct in the land, which he cannot convey, except by the landlord’s consent: Code, section 2253.

Eet the judgment of the Court below be reversed.

Sealy v. Kuttner, 41 Ga. 594 (Ga. 1871).

Pincite

41 Ga. 594 (Sealy v. Kuttner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related