Sealy v. Florida Parole Commission
690 So. 2d 654, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 2358, 1997 WL 109246
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 13, 1997·No. No. 96-2199·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s order finding that the claim raised by appellant’s initial petition for writ of mandamus was without merit. Such disposition is without prejudice, however, to appellant’s right to institute a separate proceeding raising his challenges to the computation of his presumptive parole release date, which was established by appel-lee during the pendency of the proceedings below.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sealy v. Florida Parole Commission, 690 So. 2d 654, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 2358, 1997 WL 109246 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).
690 So. 2d 654 (Sealy v. Florida Parole Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dayco Products v. McLane
690 So. 2d 654 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)