Sealy v. Florida Parole Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Sealy v. Florida Parole Commission

690 So. 2d 654, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 2358, 1997 WL 109246

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 13, 1997

DocketNo. 96-2199

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 690 So. 2d 654 (Sealy v. Florida Parole Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sealy v. Florida Parole Commission, 690 So. 2d 654, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 2358, 1997 WL 109246 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order finding that the claim raised by appellant’s initial petition for writ of mandamus was without merit. Such disposition is without prejudice, however, to appellant’s right to institute a separate proceeding raising his challenges to the computation of his presumptive parole release date, which was established by appel-lee during the pendency of the proceedings below.

WEBSTER, MICKLE and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order finding that the claim raised by appellant’s initial petition for writ of mandamus was without merit. Such disposition is without prejudice, however, to appellant’s right to institute a separate proceeding raising his challenges to the computation of his presumptive parole release date, which was established by appel-lee during the pendency of the proceedings below.

WEBSTER, MICKLE and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

690 So. 2d 654, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 2358, 1997 WL 109246, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sealy-v-florida-parole-commission-fladistctapp-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack