Seals v. CL SMITH COMPANY

Missouri Court of Appeals

Seals v. CL SMITH COMPANY

314 S.W.3d 390, 2010 WL 2502698

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 22, 2010·No. ED 94186·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Charlie Seals (“Employee”) appeals pro se from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s (“Commission”) decision finding that he was disqualified for unemployment compensation benefits. On appeal, Employee contends that the Commission erred in finding that he left work voluntarily without good cause.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

*391 We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Charlie Seals (“Employee”) appeals pro se from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s (“Commission”) decision finding that he was disqualified for unemployment compensation benefits. On appeal, Employee contends that the Commission erred in finding that he left work voluntarily without good cause.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

*391 We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Seals v. CL SMITH COMPANY, 314 S.W.3d 390, 2010 WL 2502698 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

314 S.W.3d 390 (Seals v. CL SMITH COMPANY) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.