Seals v. Capital Transit Co.
1 F.R.D. 133, 1940 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1867
District Court, District of Columbia·Decided January 11, 1940·No. No. 89987·Published·Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
Under Rule 34, Rules of Civil Procedure for District Courts, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, the court is asked by plaintiff to require defendant to produce statements of witnesses taken by the defendant in preparation for trial.
Such request should be predicated upon good cause shown. I find that plaintiff has not made a showing of good cause as required by the rule except that the statements signed by plaintiff in the possession of the defendant shall be produced.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Seals v. Capital Transit Co., 1 F.R.D. 133, 1940 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1867 (D.D.C. 1940).
1 F.R.D. 133 (Seals v. Capital Transit Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Grogan v. Pennsylvania R.
10 F.R.D. 456 (W.D. New York, 1950)
Hudalla v. Chicago, M., S. P. & P. R.
10 F.R.D. 363 (D. Minnesota, 1950)
Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Reynolds
176 F.2d 476 (D.C. Circuit, 1949)
Stark v. American Dredging Co.
3 F.R.D. 300 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1943)
French v. Zalstem-Zalessky
1 F.R.D. 508 (S.D. New York, 1940)
State v. Pan-American Bus Lines, Inc.
1 F.R.D. 213 (D. Maryland, 1940)