Seals v. Capital Transit Co.

District of Columbia

Seals v. Capital Transit Co.

1 F.R.D. 133, 1940 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1867

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia

DecidedJanuary 11, 1940

DocketNo. 89987

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 1 F.R.D. 133 (Seals v. Capital Transit Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Seals v. Capital Transit Co., 1 F.R.D. 133, 1940 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1867 (D.D.C. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

LETTS, Associate Justice.

Under Rule 34, Rules of Civil Procedure for District Courts, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, the court is asked by plaintiff to require defendant to produce statements of witnesses taken by the defendant in preparation for trial.

Such request should be predicated upon good cause shown. I find that plaintiff has not made a showing of good cause as required by the rule except that the statements signed by plaintiff in the possession of the defendant shall be produced.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LETTS, Associate Justice.

Under Rule 34, Rules of Civil Procedure for District Courts, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, the court is asked by plaintiff to require defendant to produce statements of witnesses taken by the defendant in preparation for trial.

Such request should be predicated upon good cause shown. I find that plaintiff has not made a showing of good cause as required by the rule except that the statements signed by plaintiff in the possession of the defendant shall be produced.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 F.R.D. 133, 1940 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1867, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seals-v-capital-transit-co-dcd-1940.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack