Seals v. American Greetings Corp.

Eighth Circuit

Seals v. American Greetings Corp.

379 F. App'x 540

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedJune 11, 2010

DocketNos. 09-3424, 09-3483

StatusPublished

This text of 379 F. App'x 540 (Seals v. American Greetings Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Seals v. American Greetings Corp., 379 F. App'x 540 (8th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated appeals, Mary Seals and Angela Harris appeal the adverse judgment of the District Court¹ following a bench trial in their employment-discrimination actions. Seals has moved for preparation of a transcript at government expense. We find that a transcript is unnecessary to our review because both appellants briefed them appeal without a transcript and neither appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. See Bistram v. United States, 248 F.2d 343, 347-48 (8th Cir.1957) (noting that a transcript at government expense was unnecessary where the plaintiff did not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the district court’s findings). Having carefully reviewed the parties’ arguments and the submissions on appeal, we find no basis for reversal. Accordingly, we affirm the District Court’s judgment, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, and we deny Seals’s motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated appeals, Mary Seals and Angela Harris appeal the adverse judgment of the District Court¹ following a bench trial in their employment-discrimination actions. Seals has moved for preparation of a transcript at government expense. We find that a transcript is unnecessary to our review because both appellants briefed them appeal without a transcript and neither appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. See Bistram v. United States, 248 F.2d 343, 347-48 (8th Cir.1957) (noting that a transcript at government expense was unnecessary where the plaintiff did not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the district court’s findings). Having carefully reviewed the parties’ arguments and the submissions on appeal, we find no basis for reversal. Accordingly, we affirm the District Court’s judgment, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, and we deny Seals’s motion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

379 F. App'x 540, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seals-v-american-greetings-corp-ca8-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack