Seals v. American Greetings Corp.

379 F. App'x 540
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided June 11, 2010·No. Nos. 09-3424, 09-3483·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated appeals, Mary Seals and Angela Harris appeal the adverse judgment of the District Court1 following a bench trial in their employment-discrimination actions. Seals has moved for preparation of a transcript at government expense. We find that a transcript is unnecessary to our review because both appellants briefed them appeal without a transcript and neither appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. See Bistram v. United States, 248 F.2d 343, 347-48 (8th Cir.1957) (noting that a transcript at government expense was unnecessary where the plaintiff did not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the district court’s findings). Having carefully reviewed the parties’ arguments and the submissions on appeal, we find no basis for reversal. Accordingly, we affirm the District Court’s judgment, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, and we deny Seals’s motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Seals v. American Greetings Corp., 379 F. App'x 540 (8th Cir. 2010).

379 F. App'x 540 (Seals v. American Greetings Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carl Harvey Bistram v. United States
248 F.2d 343 (Eighth Circuit, 1957)